The Chrysler Building is one of the most recognizable buildings in the world.
You know the crown before you know the address.
Architect William Van Alen designed it for Walter Chrysler during New York’s race to build the tallest skyscraper. When it opened in 1930, its 1,046-foot silhouette claimed the title of the world’s tallest building.
It held the record for 339 days. Nearly a century later, the building still commands the skyline. And less than half of it is occupied.
That icon has been sitting with me. A building can be famous enough to appear in movies, architecture books, and millions of tourist photographs.
People can recognize it instantly and still choose not to move in. Because visibility and occupancy are two different problems but so are visibility and understanding.
The visibility trap
Businesses spend an enormous amounts of time trying to become more visible.
They post more often, they redesign the website. They add testimonials, credentials, logos, case studies, and increasingly polished language.
Eventually, the company becomes impossible to miss.
But being seen does not guarantee that people understand why they should enter.
I recently evaluated the public presence of a healthcare company. The company had real expertise. The product addressed a meaningful clinical problem. The team had spent years building something sophisticated. Their website looked credible but one basic piece of context was missing.
The standard of care.
The website explained the product without clearly explaining what clinicians were already doing, where the current approach fell short, or why another solution needed to exist.
For the team, this context was obvious. They had lived inside the problem and they knew the workflows, the clinical limitations, the alternatives, and the history behind every product decision. They had explained it to one another so many times that it no longer felt like information.
It felt like oxygen.
And nobody thinks to explain oxygen.
I included the gap in my evaluation and we never even had a follow-up conversation. Within a few days, the team had changed the website.
The missing context appeared.
Their reaction was essentially:
“Oh, yeah.”
And that is the danger of expertise.
The longer you work inside a problem, the harder it becomes to remember what the outside world cannot see.
Obvious to whom?
Most communication problems are rarely caused by a complete absence of value. The value is usually there. The evidence is there. The experience is there. The people closest to the business can connect every dot.
Their audience cannot.
A founder sees five years of product development but a visitor sees a homepage.
A clinician sees the gap between the current workflow and the proposed one but an investor sees an unfamiliar category.
A team sees the dozens of decisions behind a service but a buyer sees a sentence that sounds suspiciously similar to six competitors.
The business may be highly visible while its meaning remains hidden.
That creates a strange kind of vacancy.
People arrive, look around, and leave.
The outsider test
There is a simple way to find these gaps.
Temporarily forget everything you know about the company.
Then look at its website as though someone sent you the link without explanation.
Ask:
- What does this company actually do? Could an intelligent stranger explain it after reading the homepage once?
- What existed before this solution? Every product enters an existing system. Show the audience what people do today and where that approach breaks down.
- Why does this matter now? A problem can be real without feeling urgent. What changed in the market, technology, workflow, or behavior?
- What should I understand that the company assumes I already know? This is where the missing obvious usually lives.
- If the company logo disappeared, would the message still sound distinct? If five competitors could claim the same language, the message is describing the category rather than the company.
These questions sound basic and that's precisely why they get skipped.
Smart teams enjoy solving complicated problems. The basic ones feel settled long before they have actually been communicated.
The curse of knowing
Expertise creates this compression.
Once you understand something deeply, your mind starts skipping steps. You use shorthand. You begin with the product instead of the problem. You describe features before establishing the stakes.
You assume the audience recognizes why a certain detail matters.
Eventually, the company tells a story that makes perfect sense to the people who already know it.
Everyone else is left assembling the meaning themselves.
They will not schedule a meeting to resolve the confusion. They will not email to ask which assumption was missing. They will simply move on to the company that made the decision easier.
Recognition is only the beginning
The Chrysler Building doesn't have an awareness problem. It has the skyline equivalent of perfect brand recognition.
But recognition alone cannot fill an office.
The building still needs usable space, functioning infrastructure, the right offer, and a reason for tenants to choose it over the building next door.
A business works the same way. Visibility can bring people to the door but clear communication helps them understand why they should walk through it.
The missing piece is often embarrassingly simple:
A familiar comparison.
The current standard.
A clear consequence.
The sentence everyone inside the company assumed somebody else had already written. The obvious rarely announces that it is missing. It usually takes an outsider to notice the empty space.
You may be too close to the work to see what you stopped explaining.
If you need help evaluating your company from the outside, I offer a Communication Audit. I look at your website and public presence, then show you what is clear, what is missing, and what your audience is being asked to guess.
You can learn more at rumynate.com.
Did you enjoy this email?
|
